Were the policies followed at the beginning of Reconstruction the best Essay

Were the policies followed at the beginning of reconstructive memory the best assertable course of transaction for the United states - Essay ExampleThis essay has examined the extent that policies followed at the beginning of Reconstruction were the best possible courses of action for the United States. In this context of understanding its demonstrated that the United States enacted alter percentage points of policies that considered the reintegration of southerly states into the Union, as well as civil rights policies that aided African Americans. While there are varying degrees of effectiveness in these policies, its pee-pee that in large part the inclusive stance adoptive by the American government was undefeated. In addition, while the government was lax in allowing for oppressive brotherly policies, to a degree they had to adopt this stance because of the divided socio-cultural Reconstruction climate. There were a variety of Reconstruction plans that emerged in the wake of the Civil War, each with varying degrees of stringency. The first and perhaps most influential reconstruction policy was Lincolns 10% Plan. This plan was lenient in that if a Confederate athlete took an oath to support the Union they received a pardon. In addition, if a state had 1/10 of their voting population support the Union, they were allowed back into it. Lincolns plan was generally effective in that it placed limited requirements on reentry into the Union. Still, other policies placed more restrictive measures. For instance, the Wade-Davis bill necessitated that if a bulk of voters took an iron clad oath to support the United States Constitution, then a new state pattern would be held. Similarly, in this policy, anyone who had the rank of Colonel or high in the Confederacy could not become a United States citizen once more. In large part these policies created a general state of discontentment and distrust in the South, as they believed that were being unfairly punished. After Lincolns assassination, Andrew John assumed the Presidency. While Johnson had previously favored restrictive reconstruction policies, upon assuming office his reconstruction plan pardoned all individuals unless they had over $20,000 he also indicated that Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Louisiana had fulfilled Lincolns 10% plan. Similar to Lincolns, these reconstruction policies were successful largely for their inclusive nature. Major debates emerged in terms of the extent that states should be readmitted into the Union and once again receive representation. Its been noted that the overriding perspective on this matter was that inasmuch as the lately incitive States had no legal right to separate themselves from the Union, they still retain their positions as States, and consequently the people thereof have a right to immediate representation in Congress without the imposition of any conditions whatever (odur). A number of individuals voiced dissent to this perspectiv e, arguing that as these states ceded from the Union with ease there should be substantial consideration in allowing them to rejoin the Union. Even as these are valid perspectives, its clear that encouraging an atmosphere of inclusivity was the most appropriate Reconstruction policy. In these regards, one considers that to a great degree the United States was experiencing a accomplishment of significant strife and division and it was necessary to create a period of goodwill and acceptance that would restore the Union. There are also a number of significant diachronic occurrences to the efficacy of this policy. Perhaps most notable is the understanding that the United States was founded on the right to representation and that keep back this from states would have run counter to core American values. One also considers the hardline stance that europium and the United States took towards Germany in the period proceeding World War I, leading to much of the negative view that fueled World War II. In addition to broad ranging policies that considered the nature of reintegration into the Union, some of the most bombastic Reconstruction po