Forensics- Organic vs. Inorganic Evidence Research Paper

Forensics- Organic vs. Inorganic Evidence - Research Paper Example The paper will wind up by tracking the significance of organic evidence as it moves through the justice system. According to Goody (2011), forensic evidence can be classified as inorganic or organic depending on the form of proof and its chemical composition. Organic evidence is evidence that contains carbon atoms connected to other carbon atoms. It could be teeth, hair, broken body tissues, blood, saliva, sweat, or semen. Such evidence can be traced to an individual and assist investigators with identifying a culprit. Though, there are exhibits that do not have metal atoms, they can be classified as organic evidence; for example, carbonates ions and cyanide. Inorganic evidence includes all things picked from a crime scene and can be used to connect an individual with that criminal activity. Crime scenes are always characterized with traces and marks from shoes or finger prints (Patrick, 2011). Further, there could be broken glasses, wood, crime weapons, broken utensils, gun residues and soil. Inorganic evidence can be collected physically from a crime scene and presented in a court of law during a court proceeding. Physical evidence contains both inorganic and organic compounds. For example, paint has organic solvents and metals such as zinc and lead, but it is regarded as inorganic evidence (Goody, 2011). Gunshot residue is primarily composed of inorganic materials such as lead and nitrates. Evidences that contain both organic and inorganic compounds are keenly analyzed using different means to arrive at an accurate conclusion. The chief strength of inorganic evidence is that it involves concrete collection of evidence; this eliminates probability of deviation. This evidence can be identified with certainty in a law court, as they include the broken items like utensils, windows and chairs (Henry & Howard, 2000). Further, inorganic evidence is effective in solving criminal cases